There's a better way to handle website changes

Screenshots in Slack. Tickets that sit for weeks. Loom videos nobody watches. If your process feels broken, it probably is.

What you're probably using now

Most teams piece together a workflow from tools that weren't built for this:

Screenshots + Slack/Email

You screenshot something, circle it, send it with "can we change this?" Then you wait. Clarify. Wait more. The screenshot gets buried. You send it again.

Jira/Linear/Asana

You write a ticket. The developer reads it differently than you meant. Three comments later, you're on a call explaining what you actually wanted. The ticket sits for two sprints.

Loom

You record yourself pointing at things. The developer watches at 2x, misses a detail, implements something close but not quite right.

Figma

You mock up the change. The developer translates your mockup to code, guessing at spacing and behavior. It's never pixel-perfect.

These tools aren't bad. They just weren't built for "change this text on the website."

How Intentify is different

Intentify isn't a ticketing system or a design tool. It's a direct line from "I want this changed" to "here's a pull request."

You annotate on your live site. Describe what you want. Preview the change. AI generates the code. Your dev team reviews and merges.

No translation. No interpretation. No waiting.

Compared to the alternatives

vs. screenshots

Screenshots show what exists. Intentify shows what you want instead. You preview the actual change before anyone else sees it.

vs. tickets

Tickets describe work for developers to do. Intentify does the work and hands them a pull request to review.

vs. Loom

Videos are one-way and easy to misread. Intentify is interactive. You iterate until it matches what you pictured.

vs. Figma

Design tools create mockups that need implementation. Intentify creates the implementation.

When to use what

Intentify works for:

  • Copy and content changes
  • Visual tweaks (spacing, colors, sizing)
  • Quick fixes that don't need a design cycle
  • Changes where you know what you want

You still need other tools for:

  • New features
  • Major redesigns
  • Work that needs developer problem-solving

Intentify handles the changes that are simple but still somehow take forever.

Questions

Can Intentify replace our ticketing system?

No, and it shouldn't. You still need Jira or Linear for feature work and bugs. Intentify handles quick website changes that don't belong in a sprint.

What about design review?

You see the change before submitting. If you need designer sign-off, show them the preview. The PR can go through your normal review process too.

Is this just for marketing sites?

It works on any site with a GitHub repo. Marketing, web apps, docs. Anywhere you need visual or copy changes.

What if our workflow is more complex?

Intentify fits in. Changes become pull requests that go through whatever gates you already have.

Ready to try a better workflow?

Create your free account and try it yourself.

Get Started Free

Free to start. No credit card required.