Client feedback becomes pull requests

Clients point at things and say "change this." Now that works. They annotate, you review, the code writes itself.

Client feedback is a mess

You know the drill. The client sends a PDF with circled screenshots. Or a Loom video pointing at things. Or an email: "the thing on the homepage, you know the one, can we make it pop more?"

You translate that into tasks for your dev team. Something gets lost. Client says "that's not what I meant." Another revision round. Another invoice that's hard to justify.

The feedback isn't the problem. The translation is.

How it works for agencies

Give your client access. They open their site, draw on what they want changed, and describe it. They preview the change live before submitting.

The request lands in your dashboard with the visual annotation and AI-generated code. Your team reviews, adjusts if needed, and merges.

No interpretation. No telephone game.

What agencies use this for

Bill for value, not overhead

Small changes that used to eat an hour of back-and-forth now take minutes. Pass the savings to your client or reinvest the time in work that matters.

Either way, you're not burning hours decoding vague feedback.

Questions

Do clients need technical knowledge?

None. Draw on the page, type what you want.

Can I review before changes go live?

Yes. Every request comes to your team first. You approve, modify, or reject before anything touches the code.

Multiple client sites?

Each project connects to its own repo. Clients only see sites you've authorized.

How does billing work?

You pay for Intentify. How you charge clients is up to you. Some agencies roll it into retainers, others charge per change.

Ready to simplify client feedback?

Create your free account and submit your first change today.

Get Started Free

Free to start. No credit card required.