Windsurf is a good AI IDE. Your marketing team still can't use it.

Windsurf by Codeium built an IDE around AI from the start. Cascade flows chain multi-step edits, the codebase indexing is solid, and inline editing works well. But it's still a developer tool. If you're not a developer, none of that helps you.

What Windsurf does

Windsurf is an AI-powered code editor that Codeium built from scratch rather than forking VS Code. The AI isn't an add-on; the editor was designed around it. Here's what it offers:

Cascade

Multi-step AI flows that chain actions together. You describe a task and Cascade plans the steps, reads relevant files, edits across multiple files, and runs terminal commands. It behaves more like an autonomous agent than autocomplete. Ask it to refactor a component and it will find the file, update the imports, modify the tests, and run them.

Inline editing

Select code and describe how you want it changed. Windsurf modifies it in place and shows you the diff. You accept or reject each change individually. It works well because it already has the surrounding code as context.

Codebase indexing

Windsurf indexes your entire codebase and uses it for context. AI responses reference your actual code rather than generating something generic. When you ask it to add a new API endpoint, it follows the conventions already in your project.

Terminal integration

Run commands from within the IDE and let AI respond to the output. If a build fails, Windsurf reads the error and can suggest or apply a fix directly. The feedback loop between writing code and running it is fast.

Tab completion

Code completions as you type, similar to Copilot. Windsurf predicts what you're about to write based on the file you're in and the patterns in your codebase.

Windsurf is a more integrated alternative to Cursor. Because it's not a VS Code fork, the AI integration goes deeper into the editor itself.

Windsurf vs. Cursor vs. Copilot

Quick comparison for context:

GitHub Copilot

The most widely adopted. Lives inside VS Code or JetBrains. Focused on inline completions and chat. It does one thing well and fits into workflows developers already have.

Cursor

Fork of VS Code with AI built in as a first-class feature. Good multi-file editing, Composer mode for larger changes, solid context awareness. Currently the most popular choice for AI-assisted coding. The community is large and the tooling has matured quickly.

Windsurf

Purpose-built editor (not a VS Code fork) with deep AI integration. Cascade flows are the main differentiator: multi-step autonomous workflows that go beyond single edits. Less mature than Copilot, competitive with Cursor on features. Building from scratch gives it architectural freedom that forks lack.

All three are good developer tools. All three require a developer to use them. The feature differences matter when you're picking an IDE. They're irrelevant to a product manager who needs to update pricing on the website.

The shared limitation

Whether you use Windsurf, Cursor, or Copilot, the workflow for a non-technical person requesting a website change looks the same:

  1. 1. Download and install the IDE
  2. 2. Set up Git authentication
  3. 3. Clone the repository
  4. 4. Wait for dependencies to install
  5. 5. Navigate the file tree to find the relevant file
  6. 6. Understand the code structure (is this React? Vue? Which component renders the section you want to change?)
  7. 7. Use the AI feature to describe your change
  8. 8. Read the generated diff and evaluate whether it's correct
  9. 9. Run the dev server to preview the change visually
  10. 10. Commit, push, and create a pull request

Step 7 is where AI helps. Steps 1-6 and 8-10 are unchanged regardless of which IDE you pick. AI made the coding part faster, but the workflow around it is just as technical as before.

The Windsurf vs. Cursor debate is about which tool is better at step 7. Non-technical teams are blocked at step 1.

What non-technical teams need instead

A better IDE doesn't solve this. You need a different kind of interface:

No installation. Works in the browser, on your existing website. You don't download an IDE, configure Git, or open a terminal.
Visual input. Point at elements and describe changes instead of navigating file trees and reading code.
Live preview. See the change on your actual site before submitting. You don't need to run a dev server or wait for a build.
Automatic code generation. AI reads your codebase and generates the right changes in the right files. You never see a diff.
PR output. Changes arrive as pull requests in your team's GitHub workflow. Same review process your engineers already use.
Developer review. Your engineering team still approves every change before it goes live. No code ships without review.

Intentify uses the same caliber of AI that Windsurf and Cursor use, but wraps it in a visual interface. Your marketer opens their website, points at what they want changed, and the AI handles the code. The developer reviews a pull request at the end, same as always.

Questions

Is Windsurf better than Cursor?

They're close. Windsurf's Cascade flows handle more autonomous multi-step workflows. Cursor has a larger community and more mature tooling. Both work well for developers. Neither is usable by non-technical people.

Can I use Windsurf without knowing how to code?

Windsurf lets you describe changes in natural language, but you still need to navigate a codebase, understand file structures, evaluate diffs, and use Git. It reduces how much code you write. It doesn't reduce how much you need to know.

How is Intentify different from Windsurf?

Windsurf is a code editor for developers. Intentify is a visual change tool for everyone else. With Windsurf you edit files in an IDE. With Intentify you annotate your live website and it generates pull requests automatically.

Should developers on my team use Windsurf or Intentify?

Developers should use whatever IDE they prefer, whether that's Windsurf, Cursor, or VS Code with Copilot. Intentify is for the non-technical people on your team who need to make website changes without filing a ticket. Both tools produce pull requests that go through your normal review process.

Skip the IDE. Change your website directly.

Create your free account and submit your first change today.

Get Started Free

Free to start. No credit card required.